Kind of. Just as clarification because there are many that are questioning the legitimacy of this arc as a whole, wondering if there's any other point. I mean, that trivia relates to the rules that Ash established. Even for well-rounded writers, it's going to be a bit hard to mitigate these things, especially when the author purposefully makes them OP to a fault.

Anyways, these two magics are basically OHKO, as both Dimaria and Brandish fully stated. Even if its watered-down, it's still considered to be overpowered because of the degree of influence both of them have respectively. A single use can easily render the user victorious in the RP. I can give examples, but that will be going overboard.

So basically, IF two users happen to decide to use such magic in an RP, there should be some set standards on what they can and can't affect to level the playing field. See where I'm getting at?

I wouldn't use Command T as seems a bit overkill without trying. But to add restrictions like that onto canon Magics that has shown no such limitations seems a bit overkill in my opinion. I mean yes the Spriggan are gods among common mages. I feel it's more appropriate that such restrictions should be these in my opinion.

• Magics such as Command T, Historia of the Dead, Age Seal etc should be limited to the Mage only knowning them and not other Magics. Except like a minor one that normal works with it.

• That mages of enough Magic Power, Skill, and/or knowledge should be able to find loop holes or be immune to the magic like Neinhart. Or that the magics that unless the character has certain requirements like control of Magic can't utilize it to its full potential.

I can understand limitations on Anhkseram's Black Magic, Slayer Magic and the like. And adding restrictions that can logically be possible on some.

That will be up to the discretion of the roleplayers. I can't restrict the use that much.

I think it's relatively common sense that no "ordinary Mage" would possess any of these abilities and that their powers are on-par with Lost Magic. No need to add further policy regarding such things.

I didn't reload the page so I might miss a comment. I wrote my comment based that magic like Command T couldn't work on others now, I re-read it now I see it's decent limitations.

command T and age seal aren't really all that special to me so i dont really care about it, however the other 2 rules i have a few questions about. So the no demon weilding magic thing i made a magic called Chaos Magic (Ripcordkill345) which was supposed to be created by demons and then learned by humans. I had this plan that a demon from my soon to be demon guild possessed that magic (and a curse) but that type of magic is about as special to the demon as telepathy magic so is that ok or should i change it?

and for the END thing the master of my demon guild was going to be END but it wasn't going to be natsu its going to be something differnt (to keep from spoiling the plots of my story i dont want to say who he is and no its not going to be my main character.) so would that be ok?

If it's a Magic not wielded by Etherious, then it's fine. Etherious, however, cannot wield any Magic besides Devil Slayer and can only interfere in other people's use of Magic. Therefore, if the Guild constitutes of Etherious, I'm going to have to say no.

Likewise, there is no use of END. END is explicitly Etherious Natsu Dragneel. Doing anything else would be breaking canon. Unfortunately, I cannot allow that either.

@Rip: Unless I miss read it. Only the Etherious the fake demons of the Books of Zeref are bound by this rule. The race of demons natural to Earthland aren't limited to only Curses.

dang it. alright thanks for the heads up

You know, I've wondered if Demons could use Lacrima to counter the 'No Magic' rule. It doesn't even have to be implanted, I'm sure a Demon could store some weapons in Lacrima and release them as if he was using Requip.

I'm also not trying to bypass any rules, I just want to give my Demon guns.

Because Guns are rad.